Journal article
Association between Adult Height and Risk of Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer: Results from Meta-analyses of Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization Analyses
NK Khankari, XO Shu, W Wen, P Kraft, S Lindström, U Peters, J Schildkraut, FR Schumacher, P Bofetta, A Risch, H Bickeböller, CI Amos, DF Easton, RA Eeles, SB Gruber, CA Haiman, DJ Hunter, SJ Chanock, BL Pierce, W Zheng Show all
Plos Medicine | Published : 2016
Abstract
Background: Observational studies examining associations between adult height and risk of colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers have generated mixed results. We conducted meta-analyses using data from prospective cohort studies and further carried out Mendelian randomization analyses, using height-associated genetic variants identified in a genome-wide association study (GWAS), to evaluate the association of adult height with these cancers. Methods and Findings: A systematic review of prospective studies was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Using meta-analyses, results obtained from 62 studies were summarized for the association of a 10-cm increase in height..
View full abstractRelated Projects (1)
Grants
Awarded by National Cancer Institute
Funding Acknowledgements
The work for this project at Vanderbilt University was supported primarily by US NIH (http://www.nih.gov) grant R37CA070867 and by funds from the Ingram Professorship and Anne Potter Wilson endowments. NKK was supported by NIH grant R25CA160056-03. The Post-Cancer GWAS (GAMEON) initiative was supported by NIH grants U19CA148065 (DRIVE, PI: DJH), U19CA148107 (CORECT, PI: SBG), U19CA148127 (TRICL, PI: CIA), and U19CA148537 (ELLIPSE, PI: CAH). RAE is supported by Cancer Research UK (http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/), Prostate Cancer UK (http://prostatecanceruk.org/), The Institute of Cancer Research (http://www.icr.ac.uk/), and Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre, which receives support from the National Institute of Health Research (http://www.nihr.ac.uk) (C5047/A17528). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.