Journal article

Association between Adult Height and Risk of Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer: Results from Meta-analyses of Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization Analyses

NK Khankari, XO Shu, W Wen, P Kraft, S Lindström, U Peters, J Schildkraut, FR Schumacher, P Bofetta, A Risch, H Bickeböller, CI Amos, DF Easton, RA Eeles, SB Gruber, CA Haiman, DJ Hunter, SJ Chanock, BL Pierce, W Zheng Show all

Plos Medicine | Published : 2016

Abstract

Background: Observational studies examining associations between adult height and risk of colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers have generated mixed results. We conducted meta-analyses using data from prospective cohort studies and further carried out Mendelian randomization analyses, using height-associated genetic variants identified in a genome-wide association study (GWAS), to evaluate the association of adult height with these cancers. Methods and Findings: A systematic review of prospective studies was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Using meta-analyses, results obtained from 62 studies were summarized for the association of a 10-cm increase in height..

View full abstract

Grants

Awarded by National Cancer Institute


Funding Acknowledgements

The work for this project at Vanderbilt University was supported primarily by US NIH (http://www.nih.gov) grant R37CA070867 and by funds from the Ingram Professorship and Anne Potter Wilson endowments. NKK was supported by NIH grant R25CA160056-03. The Post-Cancer GWAS (GAMEON) initiative was supported by NIH grants U19CA148065 (DRIVE, PI: DJH), U19CA148107 (CORECT, PI: SBG), U19CA148127 (TRICL, PI: CIA), and U19CA148537 (ELLIPSE, PI: CAH). RAE is supported by Cancer Research UK (http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/), Prostate Cancer UK (http://prostatecanceruk.org/), The Institute of Cancer Research (http://www.icr.ac.uk/), and Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre, which receives support from the National Institute of Health Research (http://www.nihr.ac.uk) (C5047/A17528). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.